Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: RE: AF & auto exposure
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 08:46:29 -0700

Gosh, I would have thought with all the appreciation you have for Leica Ms,
you would at least appreciate a fine writing instrument like a Mont Blanc.
After all anything less is a camera is not a Leica, anything less is not a
Mont Blanc.
 
Peter K

- -----Original Message-----
From: Buzz Hausner [mailto:Buzz@marianmanor.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 8:34 AM
To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: RE: AF & auto exposure




	Peter,
Your choice of Mont Blanc sits easily with me, I have heard they are very
expensive, break down quite readily and provide erratic ink flow, often
failing spectacularly by flooding an owners pockets with ink as well. 

	Jem
(whose Parker 51 seems to be the epitome of an M-Leica) 

	Jem- - 

	        If one's point is to write, a Parker 51 is an excellent
choice.  If one's point is only to impress, a Mont Blanc will suffice.  I
use an old M6 and E39 35 summicron...I point I shoot, I take pictures of
admirable technical quality.  Over and over and over...for years, in fact.
Kind of like your Parker.

	        Buzz Hausner