Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Fri, 04 Jun 1999 20:20:20 -0500, you wrote: >I have a M3 with 50mm and 35m RF summicron - so I've only used the 50mm >bright frame in the M3 with the two lenses. I (must) wear glasses and I >have to "look around" in the finder to see the edges of the bright >frame. > >I've been thinking about getting a M6 Classic and 35mm f2 ASPH. I'm just >not happy with the f2 performance of the 35mm summicron and the loss of >view finder contrast with the goggles. My equipment is in excellent user >condition, everything just CLA'd by Leitz, NJ. But still thinking the >smaller 35mm frame would be easier on my "aging" eyes. I use a 35 Summicron ASPH on an M4 and I'm very very *very* happy with it. I think the frame lines are as accurate as they can be, given that their coverage doesn't change as you focus closer. I believe that the frame lines are accurate at close focus, and the framing gets progressively "looser" as focus approaches infinity - but by how much, I can't say. I don't think the 35mm frame on the M6 is actually any smaller (in terms of viewing angle) than the 50mm frame on the M3 - I believe it is about the same size. So that means you will do the same amount of "looking around" with the M6/35 combo as you so right now with the M3/35. The added contrast of the M6 finder without the goggles would make for a much more pleasant experience, however. Personally, I think that if you use a mostly a 35 and 50, and wear glasses, an M6 classic and pair of Summicrons is a package that is awfully hard to beat. Paul