Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim Brick wrote: > > I'll add my M6, that I bought new last year, to Dan's sample. So now it's > two good, one bad. > > Jim > > At 06:43 AM 6/1/99 -0400, you wrote: > >Since you are trying to draw conclusions from statistical sample sizes of > >one, I can tell you that the Leica M6 that I bought last year works > >perfectly. So my example cancels out the one you listed (twice). > > > >Dan C. > > > >At 12:07 AM 01-06-99 EDT, DonJR wrote: > >> >> > >> > >>Dear Sir: > >> > >>Please explain this latest post since it must have slipped past the censors: > >> > >> > >>"I bought a new M6 body from Don Chatterton a few weeks ago. [snip] > > I've had my M6 for 6 years. It hits the floor or pavement hard about every other year. I had the focusing adjusted once while I stood their for 40 seconds. Now I do it myself with a screwdriver. When ever I get some extra cash instead of buying an extra body like any intelligent person would I buy more new glass usually of the ASPH or Apo ilk. It takes a likin and keeps on ticken. I'm averaging 5 or 10 rolls per week in this one body. It will receive it's first CLA in the very beginning of next millennium after I get a second body. Two other people have gone out and bought Leica M systems as a result of seeing my camera and prints. My second body will not be a ttl but a black version of my M6 classic. But I will not be ordering this camera from New York like the first. I will buy it over the counter from a store in Portland Oregon and make sure a lens fits on it and the pressure plate is smooth. No more waiting and guessing. My trust level has sunk a tad but part of this is my own age and my own relationship to where and how I throw my money. Mark Rabiner