Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim, Marc If you look at the demo debaters, (en mass), they are mostly new to the group, and seem not to understand that Leica Solms & the M6 is not Leitz Wetzlar & the M3/2/4. BTW, I guess PassiveAgressive DonJdumbers isn't aware of the FACTs surrounding E. Leitz, Wetzlar, and financial viability - the non-going concern fiasco of the M5,M4-2/P, CL, Minolta, & Wild experiences Got to go and count some beans now, whilst freely expressing my opinion. Guido >From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: "demos" >Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 20:04:34 -0700 > >Well... after reading a months worth of DonjR43198@aol.com's type of posts, >99% of which were either complaining about the printing on a lens box, >where something is/was made, and that Leica's "demo" practice is criminal >AND anybody and everybody that would even think of indulging in a "demo" is >either brain dead or a sucker, I decided to add my two cents worth. > >There isn't anything manufactured in the world that is 100% perfect. There >isn't a company in the world that is run 100% correctly. I personally have >no problems with Leica. My repairs have been turned around in short order, >of the 19 R lenses that I own, the 4 M lenses that I own, the 4 R bodies >that I own, the one M body that I own, I have not had a single DOA product, >starting with Leica in 1976. I have only sent in one lens for actual >repair, no R bodies starting with 2 R3's, 2 R4sP's 1 R6, and now 1 R4sp and >3 R7's have ever seen a repair shop. Two of the R7's were purchased as >"demos", new demos for the extra discount. No M lenses have been in, and my >M body went in once for a rangefinder re-aligning. It took exactly one >week! I FedEx'ed it on Monday, I received it back the following Monday. > >I not only don't care if people air their complaints, I encourage it. >Legitimate complaints. Like Ken Wilcox and a few others in the past. The >problem is that only the few problems that, for human reasons drop through >the crack, ever get talked about, over and over and over. But the thousands >and thousands of satisfied customers, purchase, repairs, etc, never get >talked about. So all of the whining is over perhaps .01% of the business. >Ken's projector problem should indeed be thrown in their face. I personally >know of only two "botched" service jobs. Ken was one. > >But the constant, ad nauseam, bitching, day after day, week after week, get >a little tedious. Especially when it sounds like someone who simply has an >axe to grind and wants the world to sympathize with him. A chronic whiner. > >I just hung two dozen Cibachromes from 11x14 to 30x40 in an office complex. >My Leica equipment works great. And everyone in the complex knows it was >Leica equipment that produced the images. They are stunning! What do I have >to bitch about? Nothing. The equipment does exactly what it is supposed to >do. Make magnificent photographs. > >Negative energy seems to consume many folks. I don't really understand it. >Instead of doing happy and constructive things, they are always whining, >moping, and complaining that the world is treating them poorly. > >B.S. > >So keep on bitching and whining about Leica. > >I'll keep on photographing with my Leicas. > >Jim > > > >At 12:01 PM 5/30/99 +1000, you wrote: > > > > > >Jim Brick wrote: > > > >> DonjR43198@aol.com, > >> > > > >snip: > > > >> I'm somewhat curious. Why do you continue to stay on the Leica list? >Why do > >> you use Leica equipment (I guess I'm assuming a lot)? > >> > > > >Jim,I'm also curious, How you just don't get it. What's wrong with >discussing and > >criticizing Leica products on this forum. Especially if it is legitimate. >If > >people encounter problems with Leica equipment, or service, then it >should be > >aired. > >You can't just put your head in to the sand and pretend it does not >happen. Just > >because it has the name Leica. > > > >I am also curious, why you have the need to query the existence on the >LUG, of the > >people who voice an opinion opinion, which at the time, is not 150% >favorable to > >Leica. > > > >Horst Schmidt > > > _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com