Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. - ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA85D.9B1E0E60 Content-Type: text/plain I am just curious. My f4/135 (E39), SN 3,465,680, has the diaphragm engravings and setting mark on both the top and bottom of the lens. Can any of the technically or historically inclined tell me why this lens has two sets of markings? Thanks in advance. Buzz Hausner - ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA85D.9B1E0E60 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3DUS-ASCII"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.0.1460.9"> <TITLE>Excess Diaphragm Markings</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Book Antiqua">I am just curious. My = f4/135 (E39), SN 3,465,680, has the diaphragm engravings and setting = mark on both the top and bottom of the lens. Can any of the = technically or historically inclined tell me why this lens has two sets = of markings? Thanks in advance.</FONT></P> <P> <FONT SIZE=3D2 = FACE=3D"Book Antiqua">Buzz Hausner</FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> - ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA85D.9B1E0E60--