Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Filter and shades
From: Buzz Hausner <Buzz@marianmanor.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:09:16 -0400

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA6D1.52459990
Content-Type: text/plain

	You just did, B.D., and an excellent point to boot.  I would just
add that my preference is that we leave the UV matter to the "Some of Us Do
and Some of Us Don't File," and that we engage in a useful discussion of the
desirable Visual effects of various filters and when their use is
appropriate, per B.D.'s suggestion.
	 
> Is there some way, some how, to separate the issues of filters as lens
> protection, and filters as manipulators of photographic effects? Everyone
> seems to agree that there are times when it is not only "okay," but
> "necessary" to use a particular filter to achieve a particular effect.
> Where people "disagree" is over the question of whether the extra piece of
> glass, used to protect the front element of the lens, is
> necessary/beneficial/degrading of photo quality.
> 

- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA6D1.52459990
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.0.1460.9">
<TITLE>RE: [Leica] Re:  Filter and shades</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<UL>
<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Book Antiqua">You just did, =
B.D., and an excellent point to boot.&nbsp; I would just add that my =
preference is that we leave the UV matter to the &quot;Some of Us Do =
and Some of Us Don't File,&quot; and that we engage in a useful =
discussion of the desirable Visual effects of various filters and when =
their use is appropriate, per B.D.'s suggestion.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Book Antiqua"></FONT>&nbsp;
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Is there some way, =
some how, to separate the issues of filters as lens</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">protection, and =
filters as manipulators of photographic effects? Everyone</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">seems to agree that =
there are times when it is not only &quot;okay,&quot; but</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">&quot;necessary&quot; to use a particular filter to =
achieve a particular effect.</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Where people =
&quot;disagree&quot; is over the question of whether the extra piece =
of</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">glass, used to =
protect the front element of the lens, is</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">necessary/beneficial/degrading of photo quality.</FONT>
</P>
</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML>
- ------ =_NextPart_001_01BEA6D1.52459990--