Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wed, 19 May 1999, Peter Kotsinadelis wrote: >In my previous post I mentioned Maxwell screens being a good choice for R >users. I this opinion on personal experience from several years ago. I >tested the various (alleged) brighter screens on medium format and 35mm >cameras and compared. My findings were published in an article in The >Rangefinder Magazine in 1995. Basically, the Brilliant Matte screen made by >Maxwell Precision optics was the clear winner. >For the record, this was not a scientific test but a more subjective one >that involved real use of each camera in several lighting situations. I >also spoke with several pro photographers who had installed the various >screens to gain opinions for the article. One in particular, a stock >photographer who use Pentax 67s, had experienced a tunneling effect when >using WA lenses with the Brightscreens installed. This problem went away >when Hi-Lux screens were installed in her P67s. > >It was interesting to find Pop Photo do a similar, but far more scientific >analysis, when they did a comparison of brighter focusing screens. Their >conclusion was the Minolta made Hasselblad screen and Maxwell Hi-Lux were >the top choices. > >Why I am saying this? Because for those R users currently using slower >lenses (F4 or slower), macro lenses, or extensions/bellows, A Hi-Lux screen >makes an incredible difference. There is also a way of having the Hi-Lux >processing applied to your existing R focusing screen (around $70 if memory >serves). For those interested call Bill Maxwell at 404-244-0095. He is also >quite a Leica Aficionado and does much of the Leicas repairs (Ms and Rs) for >KEH, so if nothing else it will be a good conversation. > >Peter K Peter, Thanks for the info; you got my curiosity up. I'll give Bill a call. Doug Herr Sacramento http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/telyt