Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ken Wilcox wrote >After a couple of years of drooling over it, yesterday I purchased a Mamiya >7 II along with 80mm and 50mm lenses and 35 adapter. snip >Any LUGgers using the 7 or 7 II? Oddities of operation that I should be >aware of? (And why did Mamiya make the meter to change pattern with >different lenses?) Ken I have used the Mamiya 7 for about a year now. It is now my camera of choice if the light is strong - those lenses are slow - otherwise it is still the M6. Anyone who thinks a Leica has a quiet low vibration shutter should try one! It is much quieter just being an in lens leaf. In fact the Mamiya 7 is to medium format cameras what the M Leica is to 35mm only more so, the contrast in noise and weight is HUGE. Its lenses are a touch slower than many SLR equivalents however unlike the Leica which is either equal or faster to most competing SLR options. The meter is actually mounted in the rangefinder and looks through the rangefinder spot, not the lens. This gives the effect of changing the apparent coverage with each lens. I wish they would print this fact because once one knows this the semi spot meter is perfect and easy to use. I imagine they are embarrased to admit it is not TTL in this day and age! Hence the verbose BS in the manual! OTOH it could be different for the Mark II. The led speed indicators are hard to see, but not a disaster. My only real problem has been accidental exposures whilst switching off. My ham fistedness I think Cheers Frank