Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is unfortunate, that some LUG members persist at this tyrade by sending out multiple e-mail which include name calling...... AS I have learned to restrain myself, I will not dignify this post with a further rebuttal. Peter K - -----Original Message----- From: Guido Soprano [mailto:guidosoprano@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 1999 4:51 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin Qualifications Don (and Peter) Your manipulation is very tiresome. Nobody said anything about owning a fine stable. The question was, 'what ahve you got' You pair belong under medical care, your mental health concerns me. Guido >From: DonjR43198@aol.com >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] Erwin Qualifications >Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 12:48:51 EDT > >Is it necessary for Mr. K to own a fine stable of Leica equipment inorder >to >ask a simple question concerning one who many rely upon for advise >regarding >the quality of Leica lenses? How many cameras, lenses and of what type >must >Mr. K. or anyone else own as a condition to asking simple questions? > >Is it really necessary to attempt to intimidate Mr. K merely because he >injures the tender sensibilities of some on the net? Quite frankly, it >would >appear Mr. K is not going to be intimidated by attacks on his questions and >he seems to enjoy baiting those who have not answered his questions. > >Why not provide straight answers or just ignore the question altogether? _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com