Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Donj, who exactly are the "group of five" to which you refer? A. - -----Original Message----- From: DonjR43198@aol.com [mailto:DonjR43198@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 11:00 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] anti-Leica-ism? In a message dated 5/10/99 10:15:29 AM Central Daylight Time, peterk@lucent.com writes: << Erwin, I find your comments condescending. When I first started on this list I found the small fragment of the group to be in control of the LUG. It was a religion to this so-called "gang of 5" and anything to the contrary was blasphemy. Leica cameras were canonized during this time and I think we now have a wide ranging group with opinions. To use an insolent tone and state "This list might evolve into a mature and resourceful body of Leica info (as I once hoped it would automatically grow to this stature)," only shows we have obviously have hit your hot button. Hey Erwin, lighten up. We all have opinions, right, wrong or indifferent. I for one prefer a bit of humor and controversy when compared to a thread on "How I stroked my lens last night." Peter K >> Right on! It is amusing to observe how some wish to stifle the thoughts and speech of others, not with facts, figures, and well thought out arguments, but with characterizations that have nothing to do with Leica equipment. When one posts a message pointing out problems with Leica products so Leica owners may be alerted to these potential problems, rather than responding with facts and figures in an effort to refute the post, these "cheerleaders" launch a personnel attack on the person making a statement or asking the embarrassing question. The post today regarding the problems Leica is having with the manufacture of the 90 mm APO-ASPH lenses is enlightening if for no other reason than it advises those waiting for delivery there is a problem that may further delay delivery. It was also informative in that the post seemed to clear up the question where the 90 mm APO-ASPH lenses are made as it said some were subcontracted to a firm in Canada and now production has been transferred to Germany. If this is so, does anyone know whether the 90 mm APO-ASPH lenses are being made by Leica in Germany or just subcontracted out to a manufacturing facility in Germany. These are all interesting bits of information for the collector as well as other Leica owners and users. I hope those who wish to liven the conversation with any comments regarding the "Leica" subject will not be intimidated by these self-annointed-would-be censors because these "censors" have not provided any clarification. I believer there are many of us who enjoy reading the subjective comments regarding Leica lenses that Mr. Puts publishes. It would be interesting if Mr. Puts test reports were based on instrument readouts along with his subjective analysis since different people see colors and contrast differently. If something may be reduced to numbers for comparison, then everyone may judge for themselves. From the posts regarding Mr. Puts, one would be led to think Mr. Puts does have the instrumentation necessary to make objective measurements. If that is a fact, maybe the measurements could be shared so the reader would not have to rely upon subjective judgments. Keep us the good work, Peter K. and do not let the "group of five" get you off the track. I will be watching for your posts.