Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Larry Kopitnik wrote: snip > I disagree. My F100 was purchased less than two months after their first US > availability. Its serial number, assuming I'm interpreting it correctly, > suggests that Nikon had already manufactured over 18,000 of these bodies. A > recent post, from a visitor to Solms, indicated that Leica sold around 2000 > R8 bodies in a year. One could reasonably argue I'm comparing apples to > oranges here. But, if these figures are indeed correct, I would argue that > these numbers indicate a much larger potential market for an AF Leica SLR > than for Leica's current SLR offering. > > Larry Just one point: When I started out in photography 20 years ago I was looking at various camera systems (Leica was going under I was informed) and I had my eye on a few of them. But I was told that not getting a Nikon would exclude me from serious consideration from Art Directors. Canon has that going for it now perhaps moreso but then and now to most people a camera is a Nikon or Canon. Getting into Leica is viewed as an effete act. (Marked by self-indulgence, triviality, or decadence: an effete group of self-professed intellectuals) It's just not viewed upon as a camera for the masses. The fact that for every Leica is 6000 Nikons is why many people like Leica, but why most don't. Only a small percentage of people view themselves as needing to own an item only owned by only a small percentage of the people. People want what everyone else has got. They want to fit in. They don't want to be "special." Mark Rabiner OK that's two points.