Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 11:13 AM 4/25/99 -0400, you wrote: > And, yes, 15 years later it's still more than a bit annoying that >the paper, which hadn't had a winner in close to a decade, chose to have >Columbia list it the way it did. :-) Ego. It can get in the way of truth, even in journalism. Disgusting. :-) Congrats anyway. A writing Pulitzer is much bigger in importance than a photography one. More in line with Pictures of the Year or World Press Photo portfolio winners. Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math