Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert Stevens wrote: > Why would an Australian Leica user send this complaint to Leica USA? Do they own the Distributor in Australia? Wouldn't the problem best be handled by the dealer you bought it from? Adeal is the Australian distributor. I am not sure whether they are owned by Leica or not, although the very fact that they are not called 'Leica' makes me suspect they are at best part owned by Leica. The short answer is that I am sending the camera to Adeal to fix, together with a description of the problem based on everybody's posts. The reason I sent the email to Leica USA and Germany as well is because the problem with scratching film seems to be a problem with a recent M6s, which in turns suggests a production problem. This is an issue which I believe should be drawn to the manufacturer's attention direct, rather than a distributor and authorised repairer such as Adeal. Judging by other posts, the problem exists with M6s sold in the US, as well. > For my two cents worth, all cameras leave fine scratches on the backs ofnegatives. If they don't, they get them in handling. Your M6 may be putting more than the usual there, but I think the problem really is with the light source of your Nikon scanner. Nikon scanners use LEDs which are a very directional light source that will show up any flaw in a negative. It may be that Nikon scanners are more sensitive to scratches, but I don't think that gets Leica off the hook. And I think you take the logic one step too far, in saying that the real problem is the light source of the scanner. First, a significant proportion (perhaps up to 1/2) of my Leica negatives show long scratches, extending almost the length of the negative in many cases). The Leica film scratches are far more significant than the odd handling scratch on other negatives. Second, the reality is that a significant number of serious photographers are using scanners these days. Even if the scratches don't show up in a dark room print (and I haven't tested this yet) is that to the point? Other cheaper cameras don't leave scratches visible on scanners. Why should Leica M6s? If scanners have changed the benchmark by which negatives are judged, then so be it. Camera manufacturers should move with that benchmark. In actuality, of course, that it's not a matter of Leica not moving with new benchmarks set by scanners. From what I have seen from the list, the problem doesn't seem to exist with older Leicas or with other brands of cameras. If you check the LUG archives, you will see that this issue of M6s scratching film has only arisen in the last few months and has been raised independently by at least 4 members of the list - at least 3 of us not knowing of the other's previous posts. It all points to a recent production problem. That's why I've raised it with Leica. My last post on this subject until I can share some new information. This is getting a trifle tedious. Cheers Gareth