Re: [Leica] Why Read "Shutterbug," Anyway?

[Walter S Delesandri <walt@jove.acs.unt.edu>]

Have you noticed that at least half the list posts are about 
other posters' off topic posts?  :) :)
Aren't these posts equally off topic? :) :) :)
Maybe we need a new reflector, for each existing reflector....or a news group,
maybe "alt.leica.offtopic.bitchandmoan" or something like that.....

Sure wish I had something to sell so I could post a pre-friday FS post and 
change the subject again!! :) :) :)

Back on topic (?)....funny how one day we hear about how nuts I am with 
my "political" posts, and a couple days later they're talking about 
sherriffs and photographers' rights.....when the infringement on our 
freedoms affects "them".....well, folks, the great big "them" is coming 
to your house next!!!.....paranoia?  not hardly, just follow the news.....
Next, it'll be the 'twinkie' tax....they're already talking about that one...
then the 'mountain-bike-danger-tax-" or whatever....yeah, you're damn right 
I'm ranting again....can't remember who that idiot was that I disturbed 
the last time, but here we go again...:) ;) :)

I hope that those of you who think I'm nuts have YOUR rights trampled 
the next time YOU go out...when it happens to you, it won't be so funny...professionals 
excluded, of course, they gotta eat, of course, I'd never wish photographic 
hardship on them...

Back to my prozac and JD now, 
Walt


On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 12:14:20 -0700 Bill <ohlen@lightspeed.net> wrote:
> I don't quite understand why Bob Shell and Shutterbug are being discussed on
> the LUG.  I don't believe that Mr. Shell is subscribed to the LUG.  He is
> however an active participant in the LUG's sister list --- Rollei Users.  I
> believe the discussion began when a LUGGer took a question that Mr. Shell
> asked on the latter list and rewrote it for the LUG's benefit.
> 
> Subscription to the Rollei list is the same as the LUG, except you subscribe
> to rollei-users.   On that list you will have the opportunity to directly
> interact with Mr. Shell.
> 
> (Of course it doesn't seem that Ed is subscribed ;-)
> 
> Bill Larsen
> 
>