Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not wanting to get into a urinary exchange, I have to respond to this by noting that I never realized that the photographer's subject was the one who decided what lens should be used and how a particular photograph should be taken. Those choices are usually up to the photographer. If you are being photographically harrassed on private property, I fully understand your objection - even if you are a photographer yourself. But if these shots are being taken on public property, and are being taken of you as a participant in a public event, I just don't get it. I think the bottom line here is that he/she who lives/profits by/in the limelight, loses his/her right to complain about invasion of privacy in the limelight. >Well, these snap-shooters have simply been ill-educated in their craft. It >is a sad reality that many press photographers really aren't photographers >at all, just photographic technicians who know how to do only a few things >competently. To these guys, the ONLY way to take a mug shot is to get >closer, closer, closer. It would never occur to them to use a moderate >telephoto and to stand at a distance, because no one has ever suggested it >to them. > >The existence of folks like that is why the enquiring minds and grand >expertise of the press photographers on the LUG, especially Eric Welch, are >so greatly to be respected and appreciated. > >Marc >