Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Dan and all others who responded - Dan, I'm particularly interested in negative quality, as oppossed to how well it prints on color paper. I'm now shooting with XP2 Super, scanning it, and printing it as B&W with an Epson Stylus 700..... Dan Post wrote: > BD- > I got a couple of rolls and hope to test them on the FA170 printer at work > this weekend. I talked to a couple of our lab people who have printed it. It > uses the T400CN channel, but the base has a darker mask- supposedly closer > to the Gold mask, and hopefully, it'll print a better B&W on color paper. I > report back as soon as I get some results! I am going to shoot it at several > different E.I. and see what shakes out! > > Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: B. D. Colen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> > To: Us, Leica-Users@Mejac. Palo-Alto. Ca. > <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 11:15 AM > Subject: [Leica] New Kodak C41 B&W > > >I've been out of town and madly deleting alot of messages without > >reading..sorry...has there been any discussion of the new Kodak C41 > >B&W....I think it's Called Black&White +.....they claim a good range of > >50 to 1600...with the only change in results being that up to three > >stops over gives you finer grain, while up to two under increases > >grain...it's alleged to be a 400 film with the grain of a 200...There > >was a write up in one of the photo mags..maybe Peterson's...that made it > >sound pretty good, although if I'm not mistaken there was no discussion > >of comparison to TMX CN or Illford XP2 Super.....My son saw some negs a > >friend of his at work shot with a sample batch and he said that the > >stuff shot at 1600 had a lot of good detail and contrast.,....anybody > >know anything more? > > > >B. D. > >