Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>> Dan K wrote: >> >> >I am trying hard to comprehend what you are saying. How could anyone >> come >> >to a conclusion that the G glass is "between 10 to 30 percent less good >> >that the M" without some form of precise and comprehensive comparative >> >testing? >> Simple, because you are asking Leica users. Had you asked Contax G users >> they would say they are just as good. >> >> Peter K >> > Not so simple. If anyone claims that one glass is 10 to 30 percent less good than another, one expects to see some objective data to support such a statement. If not, anyone can just pluck any figure from the air, post it in the group discussion and discredit an otherwise fine lens. This is mischievious and irresponsible. Dan K.