Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin, I hate to debase the LUG by yet another debate on semantics, but I said: "although the stuff won't be Leica quality, it won't be rubbish > either." Now I suppose you could argue what the definition of 'rubbish' is but I know that it doesn't mean worse than 'a cleaned-out Pepsi bottle'. Please let's demonstrate our understanding of this language we use rather than opting for cheap jibes. I'm not asking you to buy/use one of these cameras, I'm merely recounting information. with all the best LUG regards I can muster, Jem > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin V. Howard [SMTP:marho@ikp.liu.se] > > Jeremy Kime wrote: > > > > Cosina are in fact bigger/better players in the camera business than > > I knew, they've made both camera and lenses for Nikon's bottom of the > > range SLR (EM presumably) and also lenses for both Vivitar and Tamron. > > So although the stuff won't be Leica quality, it won't be rubbish > > either. > > > > I beg to differ. Vivitar, Tamron and the cheap-ass, entry-level Nikons > are not exactly high quality optics. You could probably get better > picture with a cleaned-out Pepsi bottle than many Vivitar lenses... > > > M. > > -- > Martin Howard,