Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] long lens tests
From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 08:21:20 -0600

At 09:46 AM 2/21/99 +0100, you wrote:
>That is why I outsource lens and film tests to specialists, whose work I
>respect and whose conclusions I take into account when investing very
>hardly earned money.

Alan,

That sounds like a very good idea. But I think my point is that what 
testers are determining what standards are being used to say a lens is good 
or bad? I'm sure Leica, Canon, Nikon, etc., Erwin and some others are good 
and worthwhile testers. But when someone here says he shot two cameras 
side-by-side, that doesn't mean his/her test is any more valid than the eye 
of a professional who's been at this business for 40+ years who after much 
time with a camera or lens, says that he prefers one over the other. That 
isn't relevant for me, where standardized tests help, but to ridicule 
him/her as a making a valueless statement, especially when the accuser 
knows nothing about his/her background is beyond the pale.

Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO
http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch

When there's a will, I want to be in it.