Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --------------BF5107B7ABCD1FA8C4742620 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I really appreciate the input from many of you on digital photography. It has > been extremely helpful in deciding what I need. > > I am convinced that the HP Photosmart scanner would be acceptable for what I > want to use it for and I almost purchased one yesterday. I am still holding > back because it does not accommodate 2 1/4 negatives and slides. About 40% > of my work is in this format. The next problem is finding a dual scanner that > is affordable. The Nikon 4500AF is over $5000. > > I would appreciate input and direction from LUGGERS on this dilemna. > > Thank you, > > Bob Bedwell > Look into the Minolta multi scan. It is multi format, has a higher resoltion than the Nikon and is more affordable. - --------------BF5107B7ABCD1FA8C4742620 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <blockquote TYPE=CITE> <pre>I really appreciate the input from many of you on digital photography. It has been extremely helpful in deciding what I need. I am convinced that the HP Photosmart scanner would be acceptable for what I want to use it for and I almost purchased one yesterday. I am still holding back because it does not accommodate 2 1/4 negatives and slides. About 40% of my work is in this format. The next problem is finding a dual scanner that is affordable. The Nikon 4500AF is over $5000. I would appreciate input and direction from LUGGERS on this dilemna. Thank you, Bob Bedwell</pre> </blockquote> Look into the Minolta multi scan. It is multi format, has a higher resoltion than the Nikon and is more affordable. <br> </html> - --------------BF5107B7ABCD1FA8C4742620--