Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Thu, 26 Nov 1998 pchefurka@plaintree.com wrote: > > > Sorry to bother you but I had a Nikkor question for you. I recently > > inherited an old Nikon F and I am being sent a 105 2.5 lens for it. > > I am a Leica user and wanted to know what other old Nikkor lenses > > should I hunt for that you feel might be pretty close to the Leica > > lenses. A few people have said that the 105 is fantastic. I'm > > especially interested in a wide like a 20 or 24 as well as a low > > light lens. > > Take a look at http://www.fcinet.com/ruether/slemn.html - it's a > subjective Nikkor evaluation list that I've found I agree with by and > large. FWIW, the manual focus lenses I've really liked include the > 28/2.8 AIS (not the AI, though), the 55/2.8 Micro AIS, the 85/2.0 AI, > the 105/2.5 and the 180/2.8 AIS (the AF version is better, though). > > Paul Chefurka > > I'd add the 24/2.8 AIS. Also, if you need speed and want beauty in your images, and can spend the dollars, I'd replace the 85/2.0 with the 85/1.4 AIS. Good luck. Tom P. > >