Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Qualities of a Titanium M-6
From: "Jack F. Matlock" <jfmatlo@ibm.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:18:33 -0500

I note the  exchange and would ask whether Titanium has distinct 
advantages over chrome for durability.  (I have heard that Ti is 
more scratch-resistant, but can the thin plating they put on the 
M-6 really make it more durable and help it keep its looks?  Or 
is it primarily a ploy to create a scarce item to snare 
collectors?

As for the esthetics, it seems to be that the black lenses look 
fine with all the M models, while the chrome look right only on 
the chrome and the titanium only on the titanium.  A chrome lens 
with a black-finish camera looks very strange, and I imagine 
that a titanium on anything but a titanium would also look 
misplaced.

Any thoughts?

Jack Matlock
jfmatlo@ibm.net

- ----------

> 2. Other than appearance, any benefits of the chrome or 
titanium finished
> over the black?

Chrome keeps looking better longer. My M3 from 1959 looks 
flawless.