Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Billingham - Nytex
From: Chandos Michael Brown <cmbrow@mail.wm.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 18:56:52 -0500

The Domke comes with a single insert.  The way I use it--based on limited
experience, is this.

I tried an M3 and an M4-p with the 75 Summilux and the Noctilux mounted.
They're *big* lenses and it was tight.

I threw the thing in the washing machine.  While it was still damp, I
placed the M3 w. Noctilux on one side, lens forward.  The M4-P w/ Summilux
mounted, I placed lens down in the center compartment.  The 35/1.4, I
placed in the 75 Summilux case on the other side.  I loaded the light
meter, 6 film cannisters, and Lens Pen, and let the thing dry over night.
There's enough stretch in the canvas that the bag conformed to its load. I
am delighted.  It's a small, unobstrusive bag, easy on the shoulder, and
capacious w/n reason.  I had a G2 with the 21 Biogon over my shoulder.  I
don't ordinarily tote three bodies and four lenses, but I was curious.  I
was also impressed by how easy it was to manage the whole business.

For what it's worth, I *highly* recommend the Camera Satchel.  I paid
something like USD 79.00 at B& H, and I  think that's a steal for an M
system bag.  I like the Billingham a lot, but it's posh and people do
notice it.  The Domke in sand canvas looks a bit like Army surplus--which
it to say: it's invisible.

Chandos  

At 05:41 PM 10/26/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Chandos - Do you have to buy separate inserts for the Domke satchel, or does
>it come with them?
>



Chandos Michael Brown
Assoc. Prof., History and American Studies
College of William and Mary 

http://www.resnet.wm.edu/~cmbrow/