Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. I don't agree. I'm sure that same lens made by Canon or Nikon will cost the same price or more. And the Contax G lens even if the results are really similar, are not build at all in the same manner. Take a M 35/2 Summicron and a Contax G 35/2, both with lens hood, in your hand and then put it on a camera. After that I don't think you will say that it worth the same price. BTW it's not a fair comparaison because the G 35/2 is the only G lens which is not a top lens, not at the level of the Summicron anyway. B. D. Colen wrote: > > > The following statement does not make sense to me??? > > > > >> I bought the Leica *because* it is a Leica, as much as I bought it > > >> because of its qualities as a camera. Sometimes, I'd just > > like a little > > >> more camera and a little less Leica for my money. > > > > More gadgets? Less quality? Less serviceability? > > > > What does "less Leica" mean? > > > > Jim > Allow me to wade in here....I think what is meant by less Leica is less > price charged for the Red Dot. No one can challenge the fact that the M > cameras are absolutely superb mechanical rangefinders, and that the optics > are world class. On the other hand, from everything I have read and heard, > the optics for the Contax G2 are also world class, and they are a fraction > of the cost of the Leica lenses - which suggests that with the Leica one is > paying for the name, for the fact that the product is made in a higher cost > labor market - which is Leica's lookout, not ours, etc. > > As to the R cameras. Yes they are terrifically well made. Yes they are > serviceable. Yes the optics are terrific. But are the optics enough MORE > terrific than the top Canon and Nikon optics? If they were, I'd wager more > working pros would use them than do, because there would be more of a demand > for that quality. > > I think we on this list often lose sight of the fact that it is no longer > 1954, and the photo equipment industry is no longer dominated by the > Germans. Yes, Leicas are mythically wonderful cameras. > > But they are over-priced. :-) - -- Lucien Brussels - Belgium