Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/15[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Eric Welch wrote: > The 90 and 135 are awfully close together. I would think it better to start > with a 180 and a 90. And I'm not saying that because I have a 180 and 90 > for sale. If you want the 135, they are real bargains. And superb performers. > Thanks for your comments. I have a (Canon) 100mm, a 135mm, and a 200mm. Over the years, I found that I almost always choose the 135 over the 200--working distance is too large. In any case, I think, with the Leicas, I'd still get a 90, a 135, and a 180. What are you asking for the 180? Also, could you tell me what the serial numbers are on the 90 and 180? According to this list I pulled off the net, there were three versions of the 90 and two versions of the 180. I'm trying to find the latest. Thank you.