Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>I am a bit worried that over-usage of b&w in widespread campaigns and >XP2 throwaway boxes will end up in overkill and defuse the radicality of >the b&w option in modern photography as it has developed ever since high >quality color has been commonly available. It could even end up changing >the perception viewers may have when confronted to old classics, dating >back to the days before colour was reliable, and to high quality >contemporary work. These days, grayscale is a Photoshop option among >dozens of others, it is trendy today and will seem old hat tomorrow. >Soon to be perceived as a marketing trick of the nineties rather than a >quest for the "color of the soul" , and that perception might influence >the way all b&w work will be looked upon in a few years time. We live in >a world that considers it necessary to colorize old movies and then >promotes contemporary perfumes through grayscale cliches. I'm afraid >that the b&w option is soon to become meaningless... > >Friendly regards >Alan. Monochrome photography is a proven medium, albeit a young one (a baby version of etching!). It has held great influence as a novelty, then as an innovator that has touched us all. It will always drift in and out of fashion, and will always have its adherents. I don't believe that a phase of fashionable approval demeans it in any way. To the contrary, a revival always introduces something to people who will take to it, keeping it alive and moving forward. Black and white photography is a grammar of meaning, like any other means of expression - a Photoshop grayscale option cannot impart content unless it was intended, or you have a lucky and inspired day. Meaning and resonance can be acidental but never automatic. (Oh no - this was OFF TOPIC). Alex