Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lucien wrote: > > Donal wrote: > > >Probably 90% of the photo I get paid to take are done with a > >35-70 f/2.8. It is a money maker. > > What will be the rate with a 35-90 or a 28-90 ? 98% ?? > :-) Nah, the same. A 20 and a 180 would cover all but remaining 1%. For corporate and stock stuff, it is easy to move around and use fixed lenses. My challenge is the boating stuff where everything moving all the time, so framing precisely very difficult, even with highly skilled drivers or pilots. Speaking of which, we were doing helicopter last week and at one point flying directly over the flying bridge of this 47 footer. I was shooting just the skipper at the helm with the 35-70 at 70. I.e., we were only a few feet over head and doing about 35mph. We were having trouble getting him to turn boat into light the way I wanted--too noisy to hear the radios--and pilot suggested tapping him on the head with a skid. As Capa said, if it's not good enough, you're not ..... donal - -- Donal Philby San Diego www.donalphilby.com