Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/08/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi all, I wonder how many LUG users out there are even aware of the messages archive? Perhaps the address to the archive should be included (with a hyper-link) at the top of each digest so that more people will take advantage of the archive before asking about something that may have been extensively discussed before. From where I stand, that would go a long way towards improving the list. Also, I agree with the posts that the subject line needs to be used more judiciously. Way too often the subject line has little to do with the content of the message. Lastly, why can't we try for no personal messages on the LUG. Why can't people send their appreciation messages directly to the other person. Why must they be placed on the LUG? I know I'm as bad as anyone else, so I'm going to try to improve my posts, and maybe others could try as well. :) Anyways, enough negativity! Why couldn't Leica design a 135mm lens with really good close focus ability so that an image could approach 1/2 lifesize? Does the 135 not offer high enough magnification? Would the rangefinder framelines make this prohibitive? My thought is that the working distance of the 135 may make this possible. Or how about an accessory that could clip onto the front of the viewfinder to improve close-focus? I'm not expecting full macro abilities, but something that would improve what the M currently has to offer. Regards, James P.S. I really like two of the photos that appear in the latest LHSA viewfinder magazine. The picture on the back cover and the picture of the doorbell. Who took those shots? Bill? Roy? or Vahan? Please let me know so I can congratulate you! That 75mm summilux is something else, what an image! (doorbell)