Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Mis-information and innuendo(3)
From: "Lee, Ken" <>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 08:05:32 -0400


The basic assumption in all your posts appear to be directed to a 6 year old
photo journalist. I know that at least 60 percent of my (aged 53) photos are
taken either on my property or that of my family.  For a young child
exploring photography, the percentage would be much higher.  If I had to
worry about any member of my family mugging my children, camera brand would
be the least of my problems.


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Alan Hull []
	Sent:	Wednesday, July 22, 1998 5:46 PM
	Subject:	SV: [Leica] Mis-information and innuendo(3)

	Continued from (2)
	All it would prove is that the child had a silly dillitant for a
	> Another unbelievably stupid statement!
	Well that is your opinion.  
	To send a child into the streets of some cities with such BAIT round
	his neck would be like tying a fat goat to a stake in tiger country.

	Only a silly dillitante<SP> would even consider such a thing with
	own child.  And that is putting it mildly.  

	Alan Hull