Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alan, The basic assumption in all your posts appear to be directed to a 6 year old photo journalist. I know that at least 60 percent of my (aged 53) photos are taken either on my property or that of my family. For a young child exploring photography, the percentage would be much higher. If I had to worry about any member of my family mugging my children, camera brand would be the least of my problems. Ken -----Original Message----- From: Alan Hull [SMTP:hull@vaggeryd.mail.telia.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 1998 5:46 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: SV: [Leica] Mis-information and innuendo(3) Continued from (2) >> All it would prove is that the child had a silly dillitant for a dad. >> > Another unbelievably stupid statement! ------------------------------ Well that is your opinion. To send a child into the streets of some cities with such BAIT round his neck would be like tying a fat goat to a stake in tiger country. Only a silly dillitante<SP> would even consider such a thing with his own child. And that is putting it mildly. Alan Hull