Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim Laurel wrote: > ... we are becoming a "throw-away" society (at least in the West) > and that quality doesn't count for much. [...] > Nor do they seem to care that the Optura will be totally obsolete > sometime next year when Canon builds the next thing that everyone > just has to have. Well said, Jim. Another thing I've noticed is a strong trend which I call "technology over talent". This is where people don't want to learn the necessary skills to do something well, they want an immediate technological solution. The matrix metering, the autofocus, the programmed modes, they'll all do the job and they'll do it well, but is the result a reflection of their skills or is it more the work of the engineers who designed the camera? I think more highly of a photograph that might be a little flawed technically, but was totally crafted by someone choosing the focus, shutter speed, and f-stop by themself. That is truly their very own work, a reflection of what their skills are, and, hopefully, how they visualize the photo. "Well," someone is going to ask, "that photographer didn't design the lens and the film, so how much credit should he get?" I suppose the answer relies on the intent. Lens and film obviously have to exist. Many of these technological innovations are created with the intent of appealing to the mindset of "this feature will make me a better photographer, this feature makes my camera more impressive than the other guy's", or, more simply, "you need this feature in order to make good photographs". I see this same thing with cars. At the track, I know drivers that are so smooth and are so skilled in understanding balance and handling that year after year they drive their underpowered Cortinas sideways through the turns, getting ahead of and staying ahead of drivers whose cars have a 200 bhp advantage. As someone once said, "power is no substitute for skill". For those cars that have computer controlled anti-skid, anti-slip, anti-whatever, I again have to ask: to whom does the credit go? The driver or the engineers in the lab? I see the same thing happening in ham radio and even in the shooting sports. Anyway, I didn't want to turn this into a rant - I really don't care or mind what other people choose for equipment so long as I'm not forced to buy something with features I don't want. - -Dave