Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDB166.5E32A5C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Other than the obvious fstop factor, I have often (from litterature) = gotten the impression that the overall performance of the 90 Elamarit is = superior to that of the 90 Summicron. Anyone care to elaborate if this = is so ? Eric - ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDB166.5E32A5C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Other than the obvious fstop factor, = I have=20 often (from litterature) gotten the impression that the overall = performance of=20 the 90 Elamarit is superior to that of the 90 Summicron. Anyone care to=20 elaborate if this is so ?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Eric</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDB166.5E32A5C0--