Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tuesday, July 14, 1998 4:08 PM, Jim Brick [SMTP:jim@brick.org] wrote: > I do not believe that Leica alters the meter in favor of either over or > under exposure. This would be a disaster with Velvia. Velvia is really an > EI 40 film. Meters are usually set to 50 for Velvia already giving a > "skinny" exposure. Velvia does not do well with underexposure. I use tons > of velvia in my Leicas and if they were underexposing, I would be in trouble. Jim, I use almost exclusively Velvia myself. Could it then be said that "other brands" tweak the metering for slight overexposure (with negatives in mind) ? With my Nikons, I usually keyed ISO 64 for Velvia when I wanted extra saturation. Doing this with the M6 really overdoes it. I did not know that Velvia was considered as "really ISO 40". Is this a generally accepted fact or the result of your own experience ? Do you routinely expose it at ISO 40 ? > Remember, TTL meters are "reflected" meters and it's what you point them at > that creates the apparent over or under exposure. Take a small (4"x5") 18% > gray card and after metering the scene, hold up the gray card directly in > front of the lens (filling the viewfinder frame), in the same plane as the > film, and re-meter. Chances are that the scene has stuff that is too light > and giving you a false reading. It's easy to check your meter with a gray > card. If it is off, either make appropriate adjustments in your methods, or > get it fixed. Thanks for the explanations but I am usually quite aware of metering traps. To the point of carrying a grey card in the gear box.... Friendly regards, Alan, Brussels-Belgium