Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tom, Interesting to hear more about the use of these Elcans, so far I haven't heard of any more than these two variants. If the coverage is for 6x9, then it occurs to me that they may have been used for the IMAX lenses required for their longitudinal use of the 70mm film format. The 2" (50mm) F2 Elcan presumably is not the lens about which you talk, as that was std. issue on those US Service M4s which has since become an extremely expensive collectors item. Do you think the 6" Elcan was for the Vinten camera as well? The mounts look similar for the pair of lenses I've seen. Most likely this was the camera/s to which the lenses were mounted that Pascal saw? Regarding the potential mounting of the 6" Elcan onto the Leicaflex, I found a Leitz focussing mount from an enlarger or copying device which if threaded internally would make a fine size fit for the rear thread on the aerial lens. From there its rear 39mm male thread offered easy/convoluted connection to the SL. But really I stopped short (of the full conversion) as the rest of the lens just does not make for easy ergonomics, especially the oversize, toothed aperture ring. My adapted 180/2.8 Carl Zeiss Sonnar gives me reasonable results until a proper Leitz reflex lens is available. I have this 200mm F2.5 Hektor projection lens which fits onto the SL yet no-one so far has shed any light on the different performance it might offer compared to a 'proper' taking lens, any thoughts? Jem