Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Satoshi Oka, thanks for the information, just what I needed to know. this can be a great list. I now know that the 28 rokkor can be repainted, and if that won't fix this one, that the 28 elmarit will work on the cle. Steve - ---------- >From: oka@mxa.usen-net.or.jp (Satoshi Oka) >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] 28mm rokkor vs 28 elmarit?? >Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 11:43:05 +0900 > >Steve, > >It seems that the paint inside the barrel is coming off. >Maybe, It is possible to repair the lens > > >The specs of 28mm lensese are following. > >Elmarit-M 2.8/28 (Current) >Length from bayonet frange: 41.5mm >Largest diameter: 53mm >Weight: 0.260kg > >M-Rokkor 2.8/28 >Length from bayonet frange: 35.5mm >Largest diameter: 51mm >Weight: 0.135kg > >28 frame on CLE is always visible. >So, when Elmarit28 is mounted on CLE, 28mm and 90mm frame are active. > >I have Elmarit-M28(3rd) and M-Rokkor28 although I have never used >current 28Elmarit. >I prefer the description and the size of M-Rokkor to of Elmarit. >But when M-Rokkor28 is monted on M6, 35/135 frame are active. >It is very inconvenience for me. >So my Rokkor28 is added pin to active 28/90 frame by Reinhold Mueller. >I will part with Elmarit. > > >Satoshi Oka >Kyoto, Japan > >s-oka@mars.dti.ne.jp > >DMAKOS GALLERY >http://www.mars.dti.ne.jp/~s-oka/ > >Rollei TLR club >http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~sb9s-ok/tlr/ > > > > >