Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert, this was not a scientific fact, I based it on a test of 4 DR,a #15xx xxx, a couple in the 18xx xxx series and the one I kept 2,1xx xxx. At one time a Leica Wetzlar lens expert said that the DR was slightly reformulated at around #2000 000 or #2100 000, mainly a change in the coating procedure. The one I kept is superb, my best 50 ( of about 7-8 50's), sharp, contrasty and heavy! With the 21/3,4 and the 35/1,4 Asph and the 75/1,4, it belongs to my favourite arsenal of lenses. I think sometimes our preference for equipment is based on very tactile emotions. If it is smooth to use, or just feels right in the hand you use it more often and ,as in everything, you get better at using it. Maybe we ascribe mythical values to inert mechanical devices, but my feeling is that if you are comfortable with the tool, you become a better craftsman. There are times when I feel that our pursuit of the latest, best, fastest lens or body hampers our quality as photographers. There are times when I prefer shooting with old M2's and a 35/2 and a 50/2 ( aforementioned DR) and Tri-X. Nothing gets in the way, I know the cameras and lenses well enough to use them instinctively and the Tri-x is a film that forgives a lot, so the hang-up with perfect exposures isn't that important. Mind you, I don't have to justify my negs or prints to an Art Director or Editor any longer, only to myself. Maybe we should all forego the purchase of a lens or camera body in the next 2-3 month (before FotoKina, of course) and spend that money on film and use it. After FotoKina, all bets are off, maybe they will have the new 90/2 Asph-Apo or an upgraded 50/1,4 or my dream, a 75/2,4 APO. Tom A