Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] undeserved praise ?
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 22:34:48 +0200

Hi, all. I have had the 2.0/90mm from 1987 (bought new but it is actually
made in 1984) and in real life picture taking situations it is one superb
lens. Raimo

- ----------
> From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] undeserved praise ?
> Date: 26. toukokuuta 1998 10:39
> 
> Alfred,
> 
> I agree with your comments on lens tests vs. actual use, and since I have
no
> personal experience with the 2.0/90, I will defer to your judgement.
Incidentally,
> Erwin makes that point himself. In his multipage writeup on the Noctilux
(in Dutch
> only), he writes that most of the magazines that have tested this lens
during a few
> days on the optical bench etc., completely miss the point because they
are not
> testing the lens in the kind of picture-taking environment that it is
designed for.
> His own test was conducted over a 4-month period, as far as I recall, and
included
> numerous real-world situations.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> Alfred Breull wrote:
> 
> > Nathan, I also do appreciate Erwin's sites, comments, and efforts.
> > And, indicating his sites to a new member is for sure a good way
> > to provoke another empty bank account :)
> >
> > Maybe you remember, that we had a discussion on the significance
> > of lens tests (6 weeks ago), resulting from the fact, that bench
> > tests show one side of a lens, while human perception frequently
> > prefers another one.
> >
> > So - if you ever have seen the 2/90 M Summicron's rendition at f 2.8
> > or f 4, and what it does to a face, specially in b/w pictures, you
> > will forget all about micro contrast, bench marks, or whatever.
> >
> > Yes, the original lens is a little large and heavy, but it's one of
> > the most beautiful lenses ever built. The price for a used one (1-st
> > version) in good condition is around DM 1.000 here in Germany, which
> > should be around BF 20.000 or USD 560 - no, USD 615, since yesterday,
> > when USD 1 = DM 1.63 at Frankfurt.
> >
> > Alf