Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not all new technologies are appropriate to enough folks to become a standard amongst the general population, and digital has some big problems which keep my non photo-enthusiasm family members from being too interested as of yet: All they want are nice clear snapshots from a compact and fuss-free camera, and digital doesn't deliver right now. Call them when storage media costs $7, holds 40 shots, and can be dropped off at the photo counter for quickie, non-fading better-than-35mm prints. Maybe they'd like the option of editing and printing the images themselves, with emphasis on the word "Option". Nope, none of them went with APS either--why bother? The film's expensive, and why should they care of it's added conveniences when auto film loading, rewinding, and DX encoding make 35mm loading pretty much a no-brainer, too? I did own a digital camera but found it's limitations frustrating. For now, I'm looking more towards a hybrid solution (anyone have a Microtek multiformat film scanner to sell cheap, please email me) and won't be relying on digital for attempts at Fine Art for awhile. Can't afford to! Jeff - -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Willman <bryanwi@seanet.com> >I worried about film getting replaced by digital for a time. >I don't anymore. > >-----Original Message----- >From: John McLeod <johnmcleod@worldnet.att.net> >>Thanks for the interesting thoughts Mr. Segawa. You're welcome, but my dad was "Mr. Segawa", "Jeff" will do nicely for me :-) >>I agree, by the way, regarding the pleasures of owning this well made, >>simple equipment -- though many of us probably wonder from time to time >what >>will ultimately "happen" to film in the digital future. >>---------- >>From: "Jeff S" <segawa@netone.com> It's refreshing to hear of folks still refurbishing 30 >year >>old Leicas, yet still be able to take advantages of modern optics as the >>budget allows. Hard to imagine that a person could've purchased a new M6 >and >>Macintosh 512K not far apart. The Macintosh cost around $2900 by the time >>you indulged in a second floppy drive and a printer; The Leica is still >>genuinely useful!