Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is the R6 machanical like the R6.2? At 11:00 AM 5/15/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote: >R6 WAS the model before the R6.2 only significant difference is 1/2000th >speed. Used R6 run about $1000 >---------- >> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 >> Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:34:29 -0700 >> >>When you say R6, do you mean R6.2? >> >> >>At 05:13 PM 5/14/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote: >>>You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the >essence >>>of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be >>>thrifty like me) and buy a used R6) Mark >>>---------- >>>> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> >>>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>>> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 >>>> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 >>>> >>>>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7. >>>>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely >>>>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8. The only other lenses I would ever get >>>>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19. >>>> >>>>Which R body would be the best for my needs? I like the 6.2 myself >>>>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it? >>>> >>>> >>>>Francesco Sanfilippo, >>>>Five Senses Productions >>>>webmaster@5senses.com >>>> >>>> >>>>http://www.5senses.com/ >>>> >>> >> >> >>Francesco Sanfilippo, >>Five Senses Productions >>webmaster@5senses.com >> >> >>http://www.5senses.com/ >> > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/