Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]When you say R6, do you mean R6.2? At 05:13 PM 5/14/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote: >You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the essence >of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be >thrifty like me) and buy a used R6) Mark >---------- >> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> >> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 >> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 >> >>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7. >>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely >>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8. The only other lenses I would ever get >>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19. >> >>Which R body would be the best for my needs? I like the 6.2 myself >>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it? >> >> >>Francesco Sanfilippo, >>Five Senses Productions >>webmaster@5senses.com >> >> >>http://www.5senses.com/ >> > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/