Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
From: Mark Kronquist <mak@teleport.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 17:13:55 +0000

You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the essence
of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be
thrifty like me) and buy a used R6)   Mark
- ----------
> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> 
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 
> 
>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7.
>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely
>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8.  The only other lenses I would ever get
>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19.
>
>Which R body would be the best for my needs?  I like the 6.2 myself
>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it?
>
>
>Francesco Sanfilippo,
>Five Senses Productions
>webmaster@5senses.com
>
>
>http://www.5senses.com/
>