Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Mint & Virginity by 3 Definitions
From: Alex Hurst <corkflor@iol.ie>
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 15:10:22 +0100

Marvin (hardly used) and Ted (EX+) wrote:
>
>> I have seen Leicas advertised as new when they actually have been used
>> as demos or just sitting on the shelf for years.  The justification for this
>> seems to be that some dealers consider an item never sold to be as new.
>> I disagree with this as any item just sitting on the shelf for unknown years
>> will suffer some deterioration  -  just like my 75 year old virgin aunt.
>
>
>Jeeeeeeesh Marvin,
>
>Thank goodness someone has humour in here once and a while of late! :)
>
>I just wondered if she also had an "un-used Leica?" :)

Please also let us know if there's a full scale grading system for virgin
aunts.

Fr'instance, what are the essential differences between ones in MINT-,
EXC+, and 'good user' conditions ;-?

Slan

Alex


Alex Hurst
Cork Florists
19 Winthrop St, Cork
Republic of Ireland
Tel: +353 21 270 907
Fax: +353 21 271 248
email: corkflor@iol.ie
Website: http://www.flowerlink.com/corkflorists
Home website: http://homepages.iol.ie/~corkflor/