Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]<< > You are definitively incorrect. As a professor of law and economics at the U. of Nancy (I beg your pardon for that), I know quite well the 1957 Law. I do not know the US equivalent law but in my case the french law would apply. I translate and recapitulate roughly the 41 article, alineas 2 and 3 : "are authorised digests and short citations in order to give examples and illustrations without commercial intention". >> This shows the differences between US and French law and your application in this case. Under US law the information you presented would be far in excess of that allowed as a "short citation." Tom Shea