Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Mike, 50mm and lifeboat
From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 13:58:56 -0700

I also did not see a great improvement when I switched to Leica......
at first.  I then realized that close examination on a lightbox and/or
16x20 or larger enlargements of slides were required to easily
see the benefits.  Just snapping Royal Gold and taking them down
to the one-hour shop for some 4x6 glossy prints WILL NOT convince
you that your Leica gear was worth the money.  I discovered that.
It takes patience and determination to exploit all your Leica offers you.
When I made photographs on a Gitzo tripod with Velvia in the middle of
Bali, with the R8 mirror locked up, and the self-timer on, then had
16x20 and 20x24 prints made from those slides, only then did I truly
see the potential that Leica offers.  Everyone who has seen those
prints has asked me which medium format camera I took to Bali.
I smile and say, this is not the work of a medium format, this is Leica.

At 01:48 PM 4/19/98 -0400, Peterson_Art@hq.navsea.navy.mil wrote:
>     
>     The current discussion of photographic equipment necessities and the 
>     idea of minimization seems a curious one for a group whose organizing 
>     principle is equipment, albeit of a particular brand.  Over the years 
>     I have owned and used a Minolta rangefinder camera, a Nikkormat, an 
>     Olympus OM-1, a couple of different Canon SLRs, and a Nikon, before 
>     switching to the Leica rangefinder system.  And while I do like Leica 
>     cameras and lenses and am unequivocally glad I switched, I nonetheless 
>     cannot honestly say my photographs are better now, aesthetically, than 
>     they were with any of that earlier equipment.  And so it is based not 
>     only on the obvious results of a comparison of photographs produced by 
>     some people using a plethora of equipment with those produced by, say, 
>     Henri Cartier-Bresson, who used primarily a 50mm lens, but also on my 
>     own personal experience that I share Thomas Kachadurian's opinion that 
>     "great photographs...have much more to do with the photographer than 
>     the camera or the lens."
> 


Francesco Sanfilippo,
Five Senses Productions
webmaster@5senses.com


http://www.5senses.com/