Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Amen Stephen. However I sometimes feel that many people who subscribe to this group are not very comfortable discussing ideas. If that's true then the recent thread about the relationship between shooting guns and taking pictures may have been quite apropos. It seems to me that many gun enthusiasts are just fascinated with the hardware and not with the art or purpose to which it is used. I enjoy reading much of the technical material here as well as tips and techniques. But I'm much more interested in how people use these things to express ideas and feelings or to show us something that moves us. Bruce S. - -----Original Message----- From: Stephen <cameras@jetlink.net> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Eric's site & the LUG Gestapo >I personally find it very amusing that so many people are upset about >someone's honest appraisal of Eric pics. So what if Becker doesn't >like the images ? Becker is still entitled to have that opinion and >to be able to post that view without being lambasted for it. > >ANYONE has the right to an opinion on photographs, and has the right to >express that opinion on the net, or on the LUG. The notion that one >person's opinion on a photograph is someone better than someone else's >is bullshit as far as I am concerned. Either you like it or you don't, >that's all there is to it. Other factors like experience, awards, LUG >contributions, how well someone is liked, what your mother said, or >how it will be received by the defenders of Eric, are all irrelevant >when it comes down to "Do you like the picture or not?" > >That the LUG Police want to verbally abuse and flame anyone for posting >a negative appraisal of Eric's pics shows far more about the Gestapo >than it does about Eric's pics or someone who isn't particularly >impressed by them. > >What about the freedom of speech and the discussion of ideas? > >To avoid similar problems in the future, please post guidelines of >what LUG members may or may not write or think. > >Stephen Gandy > > > >