Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mind you, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with trusting the cyborg to do your metering for you. A Canon EOS-1n can (demonstrably!) meter better and faster more often than I can. I'm just pointing out that multi-segment metering isn't a tool that is at your service--it is an automatic feature that is taking over for you. I had a very interesting experience once of photographing without any meter at all for six months. I photographed every day and got quite good at evaluating light. Better, I got very good at compensating for situations that would have fooled _any_ automatic metering (example: slender sunlit tree branches against a darkly shadowed background. I could show you the picture). There's more: to my surprise, the sense of control and confidence that I acquired during this period were pretty amazing. I came to really trust myself, and to understand exactly how to expose in some very difficult situations. Ay, but there's the rub: There are two "rubs," unfortunately. One is that, once I got a meter again (in an M6, as it happens) I found I couldn't ignore it. That one little red delta lit up was like a scold! I lost my "inner sense" of how to meter and simply used the M6 meter as it was intended, semi-spot-metering unproblematic areas of the scene and setting the camera accordingly. The other difficulty is that you must be shooting often and lots in order to keep your eye "tuned." I don't believe that shooting without a meter is something you can do when you shoot twice or three times a week for only an hour or two at a time, as I do now. (I recently tried my old trick with an M4 and wasn't able to carry it off.) But I still mistrust AE meters, no matter how sophisticated they are. Take an evening scene with shadowed foreground and a bright sky. There is one best exposure for any film for such a scene. Take your centerweighted or multi-segment evaluative AE camera and point it so that the sky fills 2/3rds of the frame. Meter. Now gently lower the camera just a bit so that the shadowed ground now fills 2/3rds of the frame. Meter. Those two readings will never agree--not with a Nikon, not with a Canon, not with a Leica R8. Maybe fancy cyborg meters will work more quickly and give you better results more often than any other way of working could do; I certainly don't argue with anyone who has decided to go that route. But there is still something to be lost for these gains. - --Mike P.S. One of Phil Davis's comments--I paraphrase--'Any metering method not based on a shadow reading is only an estimate.'