Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 04:43 PM 3/21/98 +0100, you wrote: > >>I don't think I'd contest it, inasmuch as he might have left some in so >>other aberrations could have better correction, but not necessarily put it >>in purposely. > >This is mysticism at its best. I may not know that much about optics and >corrections for aberrations, but my mind stops working after reading this. >Erwin What? That he trades off some correction in spherical aberration to make some other corrections he thinks is more critical, and then people interpret that to mean the spherical aberration was left in on purpose? 20/20 blindsight? :-) ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch If there's one thing I can't stand, it's intolerance.