Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 03:59 PM 12-03-98 EST, you wrote: ><< Pardon my skepticism, brother, but would you please identify ONE dealer who >>has reported 'big quality control problems' >> > >Although this question was not directed at me, a dealer just declined to sell >me a new 50 2.8 through the mail because I told him that I would return it if >it had cosmetic defects. He said that I should purchase it from a dealer >where I could examine the lens first. He had no confidence in the lens being >free from such defects. > >Tom Shea Either that or he just didn't want to be bothered with someone who might return a lens because of some microscopic marks in it that would have no effect on the quality of the lens. (Not that you would do this, I'm just playing devil's advocate on behalf of the dealer). Dan C.