Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Larry wrote: <<<<The discussion recently of the Noctilux has made me wonder at how slow a shutter speed those of you who use it can RELIABLY get a sharp hand-held shot.>>>>> Larry, There are so many variables involved that to commit to "the slowest all the time" I can get away with is almost an impossibility. You can have a rock steady day and shoot a bunch at 1/4 of sec and they all work. The next day you can't get it absolutely right at a 1/30th. Generally I limit my slow shutter speed to 1/15th as I can get away with that 99.9999999999 % of the time. Providing of course the subject isn't hopping around.:) One is always living dangerously using slow shutter speeds, no matter what they "believe they can do all the time!" I've said, "hell there's nothing to it, shooting at 1/8th, 1/4 but there really is something to it. Body stance, breathing, tired, hung over! Now there's a killer of slow shutter speed hand holding if ever there was one.:) So I've been told!;) But 1/15th is a safe bet most of the time. I've held a few at 1/2 but you have your back to the wall for both light and luck to be successful with that too often. If you'd like to get an idea of how little light there is when you are shooting at a 1/15th at f 1.0 with ASA 3200 film, just think "available darkness!" Let me assure you it's not very bright, but the right subject and making what little light there is work for you, the images can be quite awesome. Actually exciting when you have got away with it. :) Shooting colour under similar conditions can make your heart go pitty pat looking at them on the light table. Whether it's pushed 1600 transparency or asa 100 makes for some ooooooo's and ahhhhhh's. With 100 film hand held the existing light level is higher, but the slower speed film makes the shooting just as difficult as the film is less sensitive. But you still have to use slow shutter speeds to get the correct exposure. But capturing subjects on slow speed film of 100 can be very interesting when the back grounds have gone into an ethereal mush of colours and your main subject sitting out in sharp space.. Gorgeous!!! So that's why I always question anyone buying a Noctilux or a Summilux and never shooting at least some things with the lens wide open. Actually ludicrous to own the worlds fastest lens and then never at least try it wide open. It's the ultimate "KODAK MOMENT!" :) But then there are lots of Leica lenses that work just as beautifully wide open, it's just that most folks never think of using the lens wide open. Even in daylight! I believe there was a survey done many years ago by "Leitz" to determine the widest aperture used on average by most people. The majority response was something like 4 or 5.6. Which immedietly beget the question, "Why are we worrying about making fast aperture lenses?" All I can say is, "I for one, am very glad they kept making fast aperture lenses!" :) Regardless of the majority ted