Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> From: "christian becker" <chribeck@orion.rz.mdc-berlin.de> > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 10:37:02 +0100 > > Maybe, but if Leica doesn't come up with AF in the near future it's days are > counted. Dear LUG I'm a new subscriber, and this my first contribution. The LUG is interesting, but I just wish a few of you would exercise a little more care when replying to messages, eg, if you only have a line or two to contribute to a reply, why attach the full original message that might run to 30-50+ lines? Just a little gripe... I went to a Leica seminar here (Canberra, Australia) last year, given by a Leica PR rep. He talked at length about Leica's work on AF, saying that Leica had to have AF because they recognised a demand for AF in the marketplace. He noted the poor quality of current AF lens mechanisms; that they had to be very light for the motor to move the lens, and these got sloppy after a while. He first said that Leica was close to solving this problem, but as the talk went on, said that Leica had solved the problem through careful engineering. I don't think a Leica R AF is far off. He also said to expect something 'special' in the M lens series early this year. I got the impression he was talking about a new 50mm, like maybe a ASPH. Also concerning lenses, he said that the future unavailablity of traditional lead-based glass (because of environmental concerns) would mean that Leica would have to redesign many of their lenses. I suspect this would mean all designs older than a few years. regards to you all Warrick Lawson