Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In message <9802010801.AA01278@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> writes: > > Leica-Users List Digest Sunday, 1 February 1998 Volume 02 : Number > 136 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net> > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 21:46:45 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica-Users List Digest V2 #133 > > At 04:03 PM 1/31/98 +0100, you wrote: > > >there was this XE1 Minolta (R3), this XD7 Minolta (R4...), the CLE, so > there is > > Leica had nothing to do wiht the CLE. No. Only that the Leica CL was nearly exactly the same (I know the differences). > And you can't compare the R3/4...7 with the R8. The R8 is totally Leica in > design. Even if some parts come from elsewhere. This is of cause a contradiction in itself.